Skip to main content

Demote the boss

Does this situation sound familiar?

You are on leave or on an assignment which takes you away from your workplace for a few days, only to discover upon your return, that all hell has broken loose.
A customer, vendor or a key member of your team was tackled inappropriately or that substandard product or deficient service was delivered to a customer and finally some kind of financial irregularity has taken place.

No amount of screaming or wringing of hands can undo the incident or the damage of actions arising out of those inappropriate actions. A well managed organisation would have a system with checks and balance that would prevent the likelihood of such mishaps. In most organisation at best you can go in for damage control to minimise the negative impact of poor decisions or improper actions.

It is unavoidable that people do leave their work positions for personal or professional reasons. The absence may be of a temporary or even permanent nature. The question arises; How best to manage in the interim?

Many organisations will simply ask a junior to fill in for the position " until further notice".
We too adopted this approach. One day we found a junior person handling matters which were three levels above him simply because of vacancies, and absenteeism. This was an extremely dangerous situation.

Junior people are happy to perform at a higher positional levels, believing they are making progress and are rising in the hierarchy. They agree and often too eagerly, accept additional responsibility. They also tend to get carried away by the prospects of wielding greater authority and power of the position.

With additional authority also comes additional responsibility. Often people are not yet ready for that additional responsibility and falter if not fail miserably.
This is neither good for the individual nor the organisation.

It is appropriate that organisations review the practice of how they cope with such vacant situations.

Each organisation has to decide for itself what is appropriate, but here are some guidelines that work well. If the temporarily vacant position involved;
  1. Dealing only with internal elements, that is people and functions which have an impact only within the organisation, then it is normally acceptable that a subordinate team member fill in the position left vacant temporarily until a replacement was found.
  2. When dealing with external elements such as customers, suppliers, government regulators, or third party agencies then it is essential that the senior team member fill in the vacancy. This in fact means that the boss is temporarily demoted to handle both his or her own responsibilities and that of their junior. This is also applicable when dealing with the critical functions such as design, legal, quality, marketing, purchasing, finance.
  3. Sometimes the arrangement that worked best is to assign responsibility to the senior colleague and also ask the junior to assist him. This way the junior receives vital training and exposure and also the senior and junior both are not unduly overloaded.


Popular posts from this blog

Last thoughts and words of Emperor Aurangzeb

The 6th Mughal emperor of India, Aurangzeb was a brave but cruel man. While he was an excellent military leader, he was a weak administrator with poor understanding of economics. As a result he landed up being dependent on corrupt, fanatical people who only hungered for power and wealth.

Aurangzeb's lust for power was insatiable. In this quest he spared no one, imprisoning his own father, and slaughtering his brothers and nephews. He inherited an expanding empire which permitted him to rule the largest area of the Mughal empire's history, before he led it into decline. 

He felt that his actions had probably made him repugnant to the people and his legitimacy to rule would always be questioned. So he adopted a frugal life style and tried to be a good Muslim to appease the powerful clerics, soldiers, noblemen and the muslim public, which would allow him to rule effectively.

Like many other misguided men he came to believed that Islam meant only violent, subjugation and persecution.…

The Lopez Effect

Every now & then things get tough for a lot of organisations. This may be caused by technology, competition, recession or whatever. When the nasty stuff hits the fan, this is what typically happens at large organisations;

The CMD (Chairman & Managing Director) will call a meeting and scream and rant on how useless and lazy his entire management team is and how they have let the organisation's profitability slide. blah, blah, blah!!!!

The boss desperately searches for a scapegoat. Sometimes sacrificial lambs are found and a few heads roll and the situation only deteriorates because attacking people rather problems never helps. Sometimes the boss realises the truth, that there is no one individual or department or function that can be specifically blamed except the boss himself.

After venting his ire, the boss will issue a diktat to the management team. "I want my organisation to return to high profitability so this is what the team is going to do. I want you to reduce…

The Ghosts of 1962

Lest we forget the war of 1962.
Understanding the Chinese invasion of India and the aftermath.

In late 1940s two sleeping giants began to stir awake. 
Barring the gruesome partition, modern democratic India had a peaceful birth in 1947. Nehru the Indian prime minister therefore believed, power came from eloquence, amity and diplomacy. 

China (PRC) on the other hand had a very violent birth in 1949, hence Mao Tse-tung held the belief that power came from the barrel of a gun. 

Nehru fancied himself as becoming a world leader. He wanted India and China to partner together, to create a third pole that would not be aligned to either American led West Capitalistic block nor the Soviet led Communist block. In pursuit of this dream he stooped and pampered China to no end. He fawned over China and also rued that he did not have the type of committed cadre that Mao had.

This approach did not go down well with the Americans nor the Russians, who wanted to retain their global preeminence. They both wan…