Skip to main content

Ideology is not Philosophy






We often use words carelessly when communicating and that can lead to much confusion and even misunderstandings.  Take the case of the terms ideology and philosophy which are often used interchangeably. 

The ideologist believes that he or she is right and all those who disagree are wrong.
The philosopher believes that there may be differing perspectives and he or she might have missed something, or the other person has an alternate perspective, and they are  perfectly within their rights to have a differing view.

The ideologist is extremely confident, the philosopher always harbours doubts.
The ideologist is intolerant and if he has no choice will at best tolerate you. The philosopher respects you. 

The hallmark of a true civilisation is that there is scope for dissent, and yet be respected. 
As my friend Bala Adiga says, "One can always disagree without being disagreeable"
This is clearly the philosophy of the East evident in India and many parts of Asia.

The ideologist is masculine in nature only seeking to dominate. Ideologists can easily be identified by their inflexible, aggressive, dogmatic, blunt, and tactless manner.
The philosopher is feminine in nature, passive, soft, accommodating, clever, tactful,  and willing to accept another viewpoint. Femininity does not denote weakness, in fact it denotes strength even though its not easily visible. When seriously threatened, the feminine can be much more aggressive, and ruthless than the masculine.

Ideology is an imposition. It can only be deployed by regimentation and force, its based on code of  legislation, and then strict and often brutal implementation of these laws with severe punishments for non compliance. Ideology is imposed on humanity in different forms including political, religious, social, economic, and cultural ideology.

Where people are bound by core ideology they are quiet and disciplined and rigid. Yet ideologists are like tinder that can catch fire with the smallest spark.
When people tend to be philosophical they tend to be noisy and disorganised while appearing chaotic and even anarchic they are restrained. 

There is a difference on how man and nature view strengths and weakness. 

Blades of grass can easily be trampled by man, but not all the grass can be destroyed, because there are too many and new grass grows quickly. Its more difficult for man to bring down a massive tree.

In nature its the reverse. After a massive storm, the great strong tree falls down and is easily destroyed. But the blades of grass which bend under the storm are now standing up once again, healthy and strong. 
_________________


Behaviour of Ideologists usually defies logic since it is based upon absurd and convoluted arguments. That is why when questioned ideologists express outrage and even become violent.  That is why ideology has to be transmitted only by unquestionable force.

Ideology, like all man made things rises and ebbs before dying out. In the beginning it rises spectacularly filling a void, an imbalance or a natural weakness. Then it begins to implode and finally collapses. 


Philosophy like all natural phenomenon develops slowly and evolves gradually, taking centuries. It appears weak, but it grows and expands continuously, adapting and evolving to accommodate new inputs and successfully adapting to changing situations.

Ideology is the way of dictatorial regimes which are exploitive in nature. They suit dictatorships, monarchies, military regimes, theocracies etc. 
Philosophical societies tend to be more suited to democracies. Everyone screams, protests and rants, where no two views or approaches are the same. However once a majority chooses and results are announced everyone more or less accepts the situation even if grudgingly and life moves on.

Many Indians rue the lack of a strong ideology, but they fail to see that the philosophical culture existing in a feminine environment is a strength rather than a weakness. 
It has permitted India to not only survive but thrive  in spite of so many social, religious, cultural and economic invasions. 

The ideological approach has never produced a better, harmonious, peaceful world. One has to simply look elsewhere at the countries and regions driven and dominated by ideology and you will inevitably see a world plagued by war and misery. You will also see  an environment continuously being destroyed, with lack of dignity for life and their world hurtling towards an abyss.  


India is at a cross-road. If India simply copies and blindly adopts alien and masculine ideologies it will most likely destroy itself.
India can emerge once again as a major cultural, social, religious, and economic influence leader by relying on its inherent feminine, spiritual, intellectual and philosophical nature. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Last thoughts and words of Emperor Aurangzeb

The 6th Mughal emperor of India, Aurangzeb was a brave but cruel man. While he was an excellent military leader, he was a weak administrator with poor understanding of economics. As a result he landed up being dependent on corrupt, fanatical people who only hungered for power and wealth.

Aurangzeb's lust for power was insatiable. In this quest he spared no one, imprisoning his own father, and slaughtering his brothers and nephews. He inherited an expanding empire which permitted him to rule the largest area of the Mughal empire's history, before he led it into decline. 

He felt that his actions had probably made him repugnant to the people and his legitimacy to rule would always be questioned. So he adopted a frugal life style and tried to be a good Muslim to appease the powerful clerics, soldiers, noblemen and the muslim public, which would allow him to rule effectively.

Like many other misguided men he came to believed that Islam meant only violent, subjugation and persecution.…

The Lopez Effect

Every now & then things get tough for a lot of organisations. This may be caused by technology, competition, recession or whatever. When the nasty stuff hits the fan, this is what typically happens at large organisations;

The CMD (Chairman & Managing Director) will call a meeting and scream and rant on how useless and lazy his entire management team is and how they have let the organisation's profitability slide. blah, blah, blah!!!!

The boss desperately searches for a scapegoat. Sometimes sacrificial lambs are found and a few heads roll and the situation only deteriorates because attacking people rather problems never helps. Sometimes the boss realises the truth, that there is no one individual or department or function that can be specifically blamed except the boss himself.

After venting his ire, the boss will issue a diktat to the management team. "I want my organisation to return to high profitability so this is what the team is going to do. I want you to reduce…

The Ghosts of 1962

Lest we forget the war of 1962.
Understanding the Chinese invasion of India and the aftermath.




In late 1940s two sleeping giants began to stir awake. 
Barring the gruesome partition, modern democratic India had a peaceful birth in 1947. Nehru the Indian prime minister therefore believed, power came from eloquence, amity and diplomacy. 

China (PRC) on the other hand had a very violent birth in 1949, hence Mao Tse-tung held the belief that power came from the barrel of a gun. 

Nehru fancied himself as becoming a world leader. He wanted India and China to partner together, to create a third pole that would not be aligned to either American led West Capitalistic block nor the Soviet led Communist block. In pursuit of this dream he stooped and pampered China to no end. He fawned over China and also rued that he did not have the type of committed cadre that Mao had.

This approach did not go down well with the Americans nor the Russians, who wanted to retain their global preeminence. They both wan…