Skip to main content

The coming collapse of NATO


 In a damaged world, at the end of World War II, only two great powers remained standing, capitalist America and communist Soviet Union. Naturally they were rivals, and both sought to undermine the other in the pursuit of the goal of becoming and remaining the sole superpower.


The Americans came up with a proposal to the war devastated countries, that chose to follow America. The USA would support countries to rebuild their nations,  provide massive financing, technology, manpower and material resources. Totally open up the American market to these countries to freely sell their goods and services in America. The only condition was America would write and control their security policy and in turn America would guarantee their security. To implement this plan three security organisations were set up SEATO, CENTO and NATO.

SEATO (The SouthEast Asia Treaty Organisation) formed as an anti Communist organisation in 1954. Its members were Australia, France, New Zealand, Pakistan, the Philippines, Thailand, the UK, and the USA. It was wound up in 1977 after the humiliating withdrawal of America from Vietnam.


CENTO (Central Treaty Organisation), formed as an anti Soviet organisation in 1955 as the Middle East Organisation with Iraq, Turkey, Iran, Pakistan, and the United Kingdom as its members.
In 1959 the pro West government in Baghdad was overthrown and America joined the alliance and the name was changed to CENTO. Following the fall of the Shah in 1979, Iran withdrew, and CENTO was dissolved.

NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) is the most prominent child of that policy. Founded in 1949 soon after World War II, NATO's 30 members include the most significant 28 out of 44 European countries, Canada and the USA.
NATO under clause 5 of its charter was mutual assistance and its role was proclaimed primarily as self defence.

But when the Soviet Union disintegrated and the Eastern European countries left the Communist block, NATO had lost its core purpose. Legally and technically it had no role and should have been would up. America was in a quandary. Such a powerful organisation could not be allowed to die and so it morphed in a manner of speaking from a defence organisation into what could be termed as the 'North Atlantic Treaty for Offence'. the thunderbolt for the Globalist elites to acquire and sustain global dominance. 'Do as we tell you or we will finish you off'. In some quarters to which I also ascribe, is that a small but exceedingly powerful group of Globalists within the West have got ahead of themselves. They have pushed America to stage long running direct offensive wars in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, etc. and in nearly every case lost and NATO had to withdraw with their tails between their legs or left the attacked country a dysfunctional wreck.

American and European populations are highly allergic to see their citizens being brought back in body bags fighting overseas for some unclear objectives or for countries which most Westerners cannot even find on a map. Hence Globalists have increasingly resorted to fighting proxy wars, corrupting and financing leadership in vassal countries to fight NATO's wars. They are lavishly supported by Western arms and finances along with a blanket of sanctions. All this under the guise for fighting terrorism, WMDs or some other obscure reason but always on the basis of lies manufactured and distributed by politicians, the military, think tanks and the media in the collective West. In reality it is but the sophisticated continuation of colonialism, aimed at seizing or taking control of assets, resources and gain strategic access to resources. The biggest bet that the West has now taken after failing in Belarus, Georgia, Kazakstan, is Ukraine. The West has placed all its economic, political and military bets on Ukraine. As per the current trajectory of the conflict, it is only a matter of time that Ukraine will lose after running out of soldiers, equipment and funds and then have to sue for peace with the Russians. It would not be only Ukraine's loss but that of the entire collective West and America at its very core taking most of the blame. If, the experience of SEATO and CENTO are anything to go by the rationale of NATO's unjustifiable existence will stand exposed. NATO will in all probability cease to exist. There is another set of factors that will replay and likely force NATO's demise.


Trump takes aim at NATO
When Trump came in as American President in 2017, he asked the some important questions "Why is America falling behind? Why did America need to spend US$ 800 billion per year on defence/offence, when that money could be better invested in making America great again? Why do we intervene in so many places only to bleed America itself and lose respect and credibility? Why do we need NATO?" As obnoxious as Trump appeared, he asked many of the right questions. His thinking frightened everyone in the American Deep State and the establishment who were comfortably feeding off the trough of corruption, conflict and war. That is why he was sought to be removed from the Presidency after he won the race. America and Trump were defeated from within by vested interests and thus could not implement even a fraction of what he wanted to achieve, which is to drain the swamp of bad bureaucrats, politicians both Republicans and Democrats. But with the way the current American government is performing and the dismal performance of President Biden and Kamala Harris in the first two years it is quite likely that there is going to be a swing to the right and see Trump returning as President in 2024. If Trump returns it is quite certain that on the basis of merits, the USA will leave NATO. Without America an already demilitarised, demoralised and dysfunctional NATO, impotent against a real power, struggling to fund itself will have to wind up. Even with NATO around the collective West is having a tumultuous time. We cannot even imagine how frightening it will be for an economically and socially savaged Europe to exist without NATO, neighbouring a resurgent, confident and powerful Russia.


Interesting Links:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Office Efficiency - Central Social Institution, Prague, 1937

The offices of the Central Social Institution of  Prague,  Czechoslovakia. April 1937 “The offices of the Central Social Institution of Prague, Czechoslovakia with the largest vertical letter file in the world. Consisting of cabinets arranged from floor to ceiling tiers covering over 4000 square feet containing over 3000 drawers 10 feet long. It has electric operated elevator desks which rise, fall and move left or right at the push of a button. to stop just before drawer desired. The drawers also open and close electronically. Thus work which formerly taxed 400 workers is now done by 20 with a minimum of effort. Ref: B196_095071_3660 Date: 26.04.1937 Compulsory Credit: UPPA/Photoshot”

How a Polish Potato Farmer prevented World War III

  On 15 November 2022, a Ukrainian S-300 air defence missile struck a farm in the sleepy Polish village of Przewodów (population of 413) near the border with Ukraine and Belarus. NATO, the governments and media in the collective West immediately claimed it as an attack on Poland by Russia. Ukrainian President Zelensky and Polish president Andrzej Duda demanded an immediate emergency meeting to invoke article 5 of NATO's charter. This clause obliges NATO members to militarily support and join any country attacked by a non NATO country, in this case it was alleged to be Russia. When photographic and video images appeared on the internet posted by a local potato farmer on the site, it was clear to see that the wreckage which killed two farmers was a Soviet made S-300 air defence missile manufactured in early 1980s and currently being used by the Ukrainian forces. Some very disturbing questions arise, and demonstrates why Zelensky and his coterie and his Polish parters are so dangerous