Skip to main content

The boss is always right


It was in 1502 that the egoistic mayor of Florence (Italy) Piero Soderini was under great pressure. He had appointed a novice to work on a giant piece of beautiful marble to make a sculpture under his guidance. Typical of many bosses Soderini had overestimated his own capabilities and by drilling a big hole in the middle of the block of marble Soderini and the novice had ruined it.

Soderini had to find a solution, and  finally commissioned Michelangelo to do a sculpture . Michelangelo agreed and using the available shape decided to sculpt a young David with a sling in his hand.


A few weeks later as the statue was finished, Soderini came to see the sculpture for himself. Soderini was pleased with what he saw. However like many patrons and bosses Soderini had to impose his ideas and have the last word. Soderini instructed Michelangelo to change the shape of the nose because it was too big.


Michelangelo grasped the situation immediately realising that Soderini was making this statement because of the position in which the latter stood in front of the statue. Nevertheless Michelangelo after a studied while nodded to Soderini his agreement. He climbed up the scaffold and on reaching the face picked up his chisel and hammer  and very discretely some marble dust in his fist. He went to the nose and appeared to start tapping his chisel at the nose while letting the collected marble dust slowly fall from his fist.

After a while of this charade Michelangelo moved Soderini to a vantage point to admire the statue and asked for an opinion from his patron. After a few minutes of examination Soderini congratulated Michelangelo for making a great improvement and in a voice filled with admiration said; “ I love it, you have made it come alive.”

All were pleased and everyone lived happily ever after.


______________________________________________________________________
Without any fuss, or compromise on the quality of his work Michelangelo provided Soderini the right and positive perspective thus appeasing Soderini and satiating his ego.

Though there are countless Soderins in the world there are comparatively few Michelangelos.
  • Manage, persuade and convince the boss, but never try to impose on the customer or the boss. The interaction is almost always unpleasant and the price heavy. (Boss can sometimes include a parent or spouse)  
  • The boss will inevitably look down upon an argument but always looks up to facts, and results.

Comments

  1. Hari Karra said;
    Rainy
    Thought the David you are referring to was created by Micheal Angelo
    Karra, Hari - hkarra@deloitte.com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hari,

    You are right. This is such an embarrasing mistake. You know in the old days the messenger of bad news or finder of faults was rather severely dealt with.

    Thanks & God Bless
    Rainy

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sam said;

    This is a very old trick and we all do it this way only.

    sam

    ReplyDelete
  4. Gangadhar Joshi says;

    "If you are arguing with your BOSS with STATISTICS, FACTS & FIGURES, you MAY be RIGHT; If you are arguing with your boss on feelings, perceptions & emotions, the BOSS is always RIGHT."

    That explains the importance of DATA & STATISTICS.

    Gangadhar
    joshi_gangadhar@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anita Kalsi said;
    Very Nice Story.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Priti Quinn said;
    I saw that ! its in front of the Uffizi in Florence.

    LOL
    Bam

    ReplyDelete
  7. Arvind Gupta said;

    Dear Sir,

    Thanks for your wonderfull and thoughtfull blogs. Pls also mail me at my personal e-mail adderss
    Regards

    Arvind

    ReplyDelete
  8. Rv Anand said;
    Dear Sir

    Your postings are SURE interesting

    thanks !!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Dear Anand ji,

    Thank you for your kind words of encouragement.
    These simple words hold great value for me.

    Regards
    Gurvinder Singh

    ReplyDelete
  10. Madhu Pillai said;

    I remember meting you
    How have you been?

    Am glad to be able to read your article and I would love to keep on reading your articles.
    Many Thanks and regards
    madhu

    ReplyDelete
  11. Modhushree Babui said;

    Loved the article.
    I appreciate those who write , perhaps they are intellectually creative.

    Thanks & Regards
    Modhushree

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hello Modhushree,

    Though brief I enjoyed our interaction.

    Best Regards
    Gurvinder

    ReplyDelete
  13. V Mona says;

    Absolutely! In fact women must be given this lesson before they encounter their mothers in law! :) Nice to read your blogs Gurvinder ...all the best!
    Mona
    veefamily@yahoo.com

    ReplyDelete
  14. Col BSKS Chopra says;

    A nice article. Thanks.
    BSKS

    ReplyDelete
  15. Dear Col,

    Sat Sri Akal.

    I hope you are keeping well and in good spirits.
    I am and always hav been inspired by you and your approach and your thinking.

    Thanks for your encouragement to my articles.

    Good Luck & God Bless.

    Gurvinder

    ReplyDelete
  16. Chaitanya says;

    So very true!!

    Chaitanya.Vakati@Vodafone.com

    ReplyDelete
  17. Burzin says,

    Interesting. Thanks.
    I would have written earlier , but I am not keeping well.

    Kothawalla Burzin

    ReplyDelete
  18. Lt. Gen Randhir Kumar Mehta,

    Dear Gurvinder,
    Thanks for the nice forward.There is lot of sense in it.I hope you are keeping good health.
    Best wishes to you and love.

    Randhir Kumar

    ReplyDelete
  19. Rahul Barve said;

    Good morning Sir,

    Michelangelo truly handled the situation in a very tactful, skillful and intelligent manner.

    Thank you for sharing this article with me. Good day to you Sir.

    Best regards,

    Rahul

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Last thoughts and words of Emperor Aurangzeb

The 6th Mughal emperor of India, Aurangzeb was a brave but cruel man. While he was an excellent military leader, he was a weak administrator with poor understanding of economics. As a result he landed up being dependent on corrupt, fanatical people who only hungered for power and wealth.

Aurangzeb's lust for power was insatiable. In this quest he spared no one, imprisoning his own father, and slaughtering his brothers and nephews. He inherited an expanding empire which permitted him to rule the largest area of the Mughal empire's history, before he led it into decline. 

He felt that his actions had probably made him repugnant to the people and his legitimacy to rule would always be questioned. So he adopted a frugal life style and tried to be a good Muslim to appease the powerful clerics, soldiers, noblemen and the muslim public, which would allow him to rule effectively.

Like many other misguided men he came to believed that Islam meant only violent, subjugation and persecution.…

The Lopez Effect

Every now & then things get tough for a lot of organisations. This may be caused by technology, competition, recession or whatever. When the nasty stuff hits the fan, this is what typically happens at large organisations;

The CMD (Chairman & Managing Director) will call a meeting and scream and rant on how useless and lazy his entire management team is and how they have let the organisation's profitability slide. blah, blah, blah!!!!

The boss desperately searches for a scapegoat. Sometimes sacrificial lambs are found and a few heads roll and the situation only deteriorates because attacking people rather problems never helps. Sometimes the boss realises the truth, that there is no one individual or department or function that can be specifically blamed except the boss himself.

After venting his ire, the boss will issue a diktat to the management team. "I want my organisation to return to high profitability so this is what the team is going to do. I want you to reduce…

The Ghosts of 1962

Lest we forget the war of 1962.
Understanding the Chinese invasion of India and the aftermath.




In late 1940s two sleeping giants began to stir awake. 
Barring the gruesome partition, modern democratic India had a peaceful birth in 1947. Nehru the Indian prime minister therefore believed, power came from eloquence, amity and diplomacy. 

China (PRC) on the other hand had a very violent birth in 1949, hence Mao Tse-tung held the belief that power came from the barrel of a gun. 

Nehru fancied himself as becoming a world leader. He wanted India and China to partner together, to create a third pole that would not be aligned to either American led West Capitalistic block nor the Soviet led Communist block. In pursuit of this dream he stooped and pampered China to no end. He fawned over China and also rued that he did not have the type of committed cadre that Mao had.

This approach did not go down well with the Americans nor the Russians, who wanted to retain their global preeminence. They both wan…