Skip to main content

I am not a policeman.

It was the first ever lecture by our teacher Professor HVK Rao in 1976.  Professor Rao had barely begun his lecture and his back was turned to the class as he wrote something on the blackboard. Suddenly a piece of chalk flew from the back of the classroom and almost hit the professor's hand. The missile was launched to unnerve Mr. Rao and more importantly determine the balance of power in the class room.

Cool Professor Rao remained unfazed and responded; "Gentlemen, I can do two things, I can either teach or be a policeman. I am paid to teach, not police. Most of you have come from afar to get an education. Those of you who are not really interested in these classes but are here because of the pressure of attendance targets, you are free to leave. I  relieve you of the college's demand for attending 80% of the classes and will treat  all of you as having attended my classes irrespective of your actual attendance."

About half a dozen trouble makers left the classroom, and the soft spoken brilliant Professor was able to make decent engineers out of us over the next five years. This and many other lessons by Professsor Rao had a powerful positive influence on me and my colleagues.
Violence and confrontation should be the last resort and not the first means for tackling a problem. No doubt, fear brings change rapidly, but the change is easily reversed when the fear reduces which it is bound to over time. However change introduced by positive deeds, inspiration and wisdom always brings about positive results that last a long time and possibly even an entire lifetime. Confrontation is instantaneous whereas wisdom and faith comes slowly. History shows that 'winning hearts and minds' with respect is always superior to 'shock and awe' using violence. Unfortunately arrogance born of  great physical strength always pushes humans to dominate rather than cooperate.

Everyday with every new outrage or incident, we see governments passing new and even more draconian rules to empower certain officials and various government departments.  The situation rarely improves but life becomes harder, harsher and harmful to our physical and spiritual well-being. The custodians of the law and their actions soon come to mirror the very criminals they seek to control. The righteous and the wicked soon become one and the same.

The American people and America as a nation are great in many ways. Inexplicably  the American government led by violent hawks has come to depend heavily on the use of force and violence to achieve its objectives.
America probably the most violent society today, spends annually US$ 705 Billion on its military and security. It has the highest number of lawyers and judges in the world, highly aggressive police forces which are excessively armed and the largest possession of firearms in the hands of its citizens.  America has 5% of the world's population but 25% of all the world's prisoners. Yet it various polls by Gallup, Newsweek etc.  report that  a majority of Americans  do not feel much safer either at home or abroad.

Never in history has any issue ever been resolved by confrontation or by physical force. Force can at best deliver an uneasy truce. Sustainable peace and happiness needs faith, respect, justice,  fewer and simpler laws, much less policemen and fewer punishments. 

We are all humans who are wonderful and strange in our own unique way. We need to engage with and give people and communities more space not subject them to more regimentation and policing.              A people once awoken from their slumber are much easier to lead but more difficult to drive.

Nothing external to you, has any power over you.  Ralph Waldo Emerson


Popular posts from this blog

Last thoughts and words of Emperor Aurangzeb

The 6th Mughal emperor of India, Aurangzeb was a brave but cruel man. While he was an excellent military leader, he was a weak administrator with poor understanding of economics. As a result he landed up being dependent on corrupt, fanatical people who only hungered for power and wealth.

Aurangzeb's lust for power was insatiable. In this quest he spared no one, imprisoning his own father, and slaughtering his brothers and nephews. He inherited an expanding empire which permitted him to rule the largest area of the Mughal empire's history, before he led it into decline. 

He felt that his actions had probably made him repugnant to the people and his legitimacy to rule would always be questioned. So he adopted a frugal life style and tried to be a good Muslim to appease the powerful clerics, soldiers, noblemen and the muslim public, which would allow him to rule effectively.

Like many other misguided men he came to believed that Islam meant only violent, subjugation and persecution.…

The Lopez Effect

Every now & then things get tough for a lot of organisations. This may be caused by technology, competition, recession or whatever. When the nasty stuff hits the fan, this is what typically happens at large organisations;

The CMD (Chairman & Managing Director) will call a meeting and scream and rant on how useless and lazy his entire management team is and how they have let the organisation's profitability slide. blah, blah, blah!!!!

The boss desperately searches for a scapegoat. Sometimes sacrificial lambs are found and a few heads roll and the situation only deteriorates because attacking people rather problems never helps. Sometimes the boss realises the truth, that there is no one individual or department or function that can be specifically blamed except the boss himself.

After venting his ire, the boss will issue a diktat to the management team. "I want my organisation to return to high profitability so this is what the team is going to do. I want you to reduce…

The Ghosts of 1962

Lest we forget the war of 1962.
Understanding the Chinese invasion of India and the aftermath.

In late 1940s two sleeping giants began to stir awake. 
Barring the gruesome partition, modern democratic India had a peaceful birth in 1947. Nehru the Indian prime minister therefore believed, power came from eloquence, amity and diplomacy. 

China (PRC) on the other hand had a very violent birth in 1949, hence Mao Tse-tung held the belief that power came from the barrel of a gun. 

Nehru fancied himself as becoming a world leader. He wanted India and China to partner together, to create a third pole that would not be aligned to either American led West Capitalistic block nor the Soviet led Communist block. In pursuit of this dream he stooped and pampered China to no end. He fawned over China and also rued that he did not have the type of committed cadre that Mao had.

This approach did not go down well with the Americans nor the Russians, who wanted to retain their global preeminence. They both wan…