Skip to main content

Taking credit ..... and blame

During the Wharton India Economic Forum held in Philadelphia on 22 March 2008, former President of India Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam ji was asked a question based on his own experience on how leaders should manage failure.

Dr. Abdul Kalam responded: 

"In 1973, I was appointed project director of India's satellite launch program. Our goal was to put the 'Rohini' satellite into orbit by 1980. I was given all the necessary funds and the talented people I needed."
"Several thousand people were involved in this ambitious target and in 1979 we made the launch. Unfortunately the satellite plunged into the Bay of Bengal soon after launch. Professor Satish Dhawan the head of ISRO, (Indian Space Research Organisation) had called a press conference. Through the media he made known to  the world that the failure was his responsibility and by the next year they would have the problems solved."

"The following year in July of 1980 the satellite was successfully launched, much to the joy of all Indians. Again there was a press conference but this time Prof. Satish Dhawan took Dr. Abdul Kalam aside and said "You conduct the press conference today".

That day Dr. Abdul Kalam learnt the most important management lesson of his life.  "When failure occurs the man at the top should take responsibility and when there is success let it be that of your team."

Satish Dhawan ji

Only people who attempt to do anything make mistakes. All great men have learnt from their mistakes. Those who do not make mistakes, do not make anything. 

To succeed, Leadership tasked with innovation,  have to give their team the freedom to make mistakes, (mistake is different from negligence). When organisations cannot tolerate mistakes they fail to evolve and that usually means organisational demise in the long run.

Its easy to make someone a scapegoat, and satiate the blood lust of detractors for a while, and that is exactly what good leaders must never do. Within the organisation they are merciless, but they shield the team in public, when its a genuine mistake. 

In this case Satish Dhawan ji demonstrated true leadership, the kind that builds great institutions and communities. The hall mark of great people is their ability to get things done, with confidence in the capabilities of both their team and themselves and humility in accepting the contribution of others in the success.

Some information,on the Indian Space program.

Success does not necessarily come by throwing money at a challenge. It comes from passion, intelligence, faith in oneself and commitment of team members, grit, and learning to make do within the constraints we have.

Short of funds, and resources, at the start, ISRO initially launched a satellite that was transported to the launch pad on a bullock cart with some components of the rocket being transported on a bicycle. The mission was a success.

These men and women of integrity, did not allow anything to come between them and their mission. This is why they are national heroes and an inspiring reminder of the power of human spirit, character and intellect.

To honour this great son of India, scientist, remarkable human being and inspiring leader, India honoured him in 2002  by renaming the satellite launch centre at Sriharikota, located about 100 km north of Chennai, as the Satish Dhawan Space Centre


Popular posts from this blog

Last thoughts and words of Emperor Aurangzeb

The 6th Mughal emperor of India, Aurangzeb was a brave but cruel man. While he was an excellent military leader, he was a weak administrator with poor understanding of economics. As a result he landed up being dependent on corrupt, fanatical people who only hungered for power and wealth.

Aurangzeb's lust for power was insatiable. In this quest he spared no one, imprisoning his own father, and slaughtering his brothers and nephews. He inherited an expanding empire which permitted him to rule the largest area of the Mughal empire's history, before he led it into decline. 

He felt that his actions had probably made him repugnant to the people and his legitimacy to rule would always be questioned. So he adopted a frugal life style and tried to be a good Muslim to appease the powerful clerics, soldiers, noblemen and the muslim public, which would allow him to rule effectively.

Like many other misguided men he came to believed that Islam meant only violent, subjugation and persecution.…

The Lopez Effect

Every now & then things get tough for a lot of organisations. This may be caused by technology, competition, recession or whatever. When the nasty stuff hits the fan, this is what typically happens at large organisations;

The CMD (Chairman & Managing Director) will call a meeting and scream and rant on how useless and lazy his entire management team is and how they have let the organisation's profitability slide. blah, blah, blah!!!!

The boss desperately searches for a scapegoat. Sometimes sacrificial lambs are found and a few heads roll and the situation only deteriorates because attacking people rather problems never helps. Sometimes the boss realises the truth, that there is no one individual or department or function that can be specifically blamed except the boss himself.

After venting his ire, the boss will issue a diktat to the management team. "I want my organisation to return to high profitability so this is what the team is going to do. I want you to reduce…

The Ghosts of 1962

Lest we forget the war of 1962.
Understanding the Chinese invasion of India and the aftermath.

In late 1940s two sleeping giants began to stir awake. 
Barring the gruesome partition, modern democratic India had a peaceful birth in 1947. Nehru the Indian prime minister therefore believed, power came from eloquence, amity and diplomacy. 

China (PRC) on the other hand had a very violent birth in 1949, hence Mao Tse-tung held the belief that power came from the barrel of a gun. 

Nehru fancied himself as becoming a world leader. He wanted India and China to partner together, to create a third pole that would not be aligned to either American led West Capitalistic block nor the Soviet led Communist block. In pursuit of this dream he stooped and pampered China to no end. He fawned over China and also rued that he did not have the type of committed cadre that Mao had.

This approach did not go down well with the Americans nor the Russians, who wanted to retain their global preeminence. They both wan…