Skip to main content

Backseat Driving India



I am a happily married man.
Does this mean that I and my wife do not disagree? We disagree on most things yet we are not uncomfortable with our differences, save one. The way I drive a car is the subject of most of our disagreements.

I have often offered to let her drive or use our chauffeur. However she insists that I drive in a manner that suits her expectations. The only problem is that in 30 years I still have not figured out what exactly it is that I must do.  Backseat driving is common all over the world. No one is happy and the results are often disappointing and sometimes dangerous.





The situation is not restricted to couples alone but also to organisations and even nations.
We Indians face the same situation in our nation's decade old leadership.

Though not husband and wife, they make a political couple. Dr. Manmohan Singh and Mrs. Sonia Gandhi*. Sonia is a person completely lacking in personal merit, therefore not surprisingly the puppet of a group of powerful people and lobbies with vested interests. She has become the president of the Congress party by default under freak circumstances.

Manmohan Singh hand chosen by Sonia Gandhi and plonked into the Prime Minister's chair is a pliant and spineless man, this makes him the perfect puppet. Being intelligent he however has a mind of his own which he occasionally uses only to be overruled or simply ignored by one and all.

The office of the Prime Minister is not something trivial. Sonia and Manmohan by their acts of omission and commission have damaged very seriously India's immediate and long term social, and economic health.

It is said that a person with one watch knows the time, but the person with two watches never knows the real time. So it is with leadership. Two incompetent and unsuitable people coming together has only compounded the tragedy of incompetent individual leadership. Now who is in charge is any ones guess.

Imagine that India is a bus with Prime Minister Manmohan Singh as the driver. Sitting behind him and leaning on him is Sonia a person without any knowledge, experience or competency in driving or the rules of driving, indulging in direct back seat driving.

Further visualise that  Sonia herself is now joined by a group of manipulative cunning advisors with their own individual agendas. Now load the space immediately behind the driver's space with very strange coalition partners each forcibly wanting to hijack the bus through their strange individual routes towards even stranger destinations. 

Sitting at the rear of the bus are you and me, and a billion plus passengers, some panic stricken, some amused and many appearing carefree.  This is the great Indian political circus, immensely entertaining and nation threatening.

Now with the imposed entry of the inexperienced and rather immature Rahul Gandhi into the bus and his occasional grabbing of the steering wheel, and the near total abdication of Manmohan Singh from driving, the circus ride promises to get wilder and even more dangerously close to the abyss.

Maybe this is a good time to start praying.

* Sonia Gandhi and her family are not related to Mahatma Gandhi in any way.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Last thoughts and words of Emperor Aurangzeb

The 6th Mughal emperor of India, Aurangzeb was a brave but cruel man. While he was an excellent military leader, he was a weak administrator with poor understanding of economics. As a result he landed up being dependent on corrupt, fanatical people who only hungered for power and wealth.

Aurangzeb's lust for power was insatiable. In this quest he spared no one, imprisoning his own father, and slaughtering his brothers and nephews. He inherited an expanding empire which permitted him to rule the largest area of the Mughal empire's history, before he led it into decline. 

He felt that his actions had probably made him repugnant to the people and his legitimacy to rule would always be questioned. So he adopted a frugal life style and tried to be a good Muslim to appease the powerful clerics, soldiers, noblemen and the muslim public, which would allow him to rule effectively.

Like many other misguided men he came to believed that Islam meant only violent, subjugation and persecution.…

The Lopez Effect

Every now & then things get tough for a lot of organisations. This may be caused by technology, competition, recession or whatever. When the nasty stuff hits the fan, this is what typically happens at large organisations;

The CMD (Chairman & Managing Director) will call a meeting and scream and rant on how useless and lazy his entire management team is and how they have let the organisation's profitability slide. blah, blah, blah!!!!

The boss desperately searches for a scapegoat. Sometimes sacrificial lambs are found and a few heads roll and the situation only deteriorates because attacking people rather problems never helps. Sometimes the boss realises the truth, that there is no one individual or department or function that can be specifically blamed except the boss himself.

After venting his ire, the boss will issue a diktat to the management team. "I want my organisation to return to high profitability so this is what the team is going to do. I want you to reduce…

The Ghosts of 1962

Lest we forget the war of 1962.
Understanding the Chinese invasion of India and the aftermath.




In late 1940s two sleeping giants began to stir awake. 
Barring the gruesome partition, modern democratic India had a peaceful birth in 1947. Nehru the Indian prime minister therefore believed, power came from eloquence, amity and diplomacy. 

China (PRC) on the other hand had a very violent birth in 1949, hence Mao Tse-tung held the belief that power came from the barrel of a gun. 

Nehru fancied himself as becoming a world leader. He wanted India and China to partner together, to create a third pole that would not be aligned to either American led West Capitalistic block nor the Soviet led Communist block. In pursuit of this dream he stooped and pampered China to no end. He fawned over China and also rued that he did not have the type of committed cadre that Mao had.

This approach did not go down well with the Americans nor the Russians, who wanted to retain their global preeminence. They both wan…