Skip to main content

Don't steal my thunder

Henry Ford the American legend, was obsessed with being the only shareholder and manager of his company.  Ford carefully analysed the work and its flow and broke up the tasks into the smallest possible elements so that tasks could be performed without application of mind or spirit repeatedly by faceless and nameless workers. Henry Ford designed his operations so that workers were completely dispensable and easily replaceable by any other able bodied worker.

This approach inhumane as it may appear, gave the brilliant Henry Ford, tremendous improvements in productivity and savings in cost, helping Ford to leave his competitors a long way behind. Initial success was phenomenal. In early 1920’s Ford motor company’s share of American automotive market was an eye popping 75%. This approach soon thereafter became a norm in all industries. (This is why majority of trade union activities focussed more on work conditions than only on increase in wages.)

Henry Ford was obsessed with being in personal control. He employed a private secret police headed by the notorious Mr. Harry Bennett which was brutal and had a two point agenda; to ensure that no Ford executive made any decisions and that no worker should express an opinion or an emotion.

Management team is the most precious asset of any organisation and one that needs a long time to develop and build up and a very short time of bad leadership to destroy. Henry Ford continuously attacked his own management team, he remained the only manager in the organisation.

Henry Ford the greatest asset of Ford Motor Company soon became its greatest unsustainable liability.
_____________________

By 1939 Ford's market share had dropped to 20%.  The company was losing at that time US$ 10 Million per month and was eventually revived only by the professional approach of Henry Ford II who was Henry Ford’s grandson.

Never been groomed for the job of owner and President, Henry Ford II realised that he needed management help. He hired 10 very competent men to assist him.



In 1946 the company hired a smart, hardworking youngster called Lee Iacocca. His marketing, planning and execution skills saw him reach the top position of Ford as President in 1970.

Against all opposition and great odds. Iacocca was successful in developing a series of highly successful vehicles, the most notable was the Ford Mustang.

In the first two years the car made over $1.1 billion in net profits – in 1964 dollars.  Iacocca’s photo appeared on the cover of both Newsweek and Time in the same week.  


But Iacocca had overstepped the bounds of political power.  He had become a public figure, which did not sit well with Henry Ford II.  Over the next  ten years their relationship would deteriorate.

In 1978 Henry Ford II dismissed Iacocca as President in spite of the fact that Ford Motor Company posted a record US$ 2 Billion profit. Publicly Ford said "You just don't like some people". Privately he told Iacocca "Don't steal my thunder".




A truly great person is able to transcend his or her ego. Unfortunately the head of many families and organisations suffer from great insecurity, bogged down with conspiracy theories and hence have extremely fragile egos. If they have overpowering, unchecked authority without checks and balance they become  their own and their family /organisation's worst enemy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Last thoughts and words of Emperor Aurangzeb

The 6th Mughal emperor of India, Aurangzeb was a brave but cruel man. While he was an excellent military leader, he was a weak administrator with poor understanding of economics. As a result he landed up being dependent on corrupt, fanatical people who only hungered for power and wealth.

Aurangzeb's lust for power was insatiable. In this quest he spared no one, imprisoning his own father, and slaughtering his brothers and nephews. He inherited an expanding empire which permitted him to rule the largest area of the Mughal empire's history, before he led it into decline. 

He felt that his actions had probably made him repugnant to the people and his legitimacy to rule would always be questioned. So he adopted a frugal life style and tried to be a good Muslim to appease the powerful clerics, soldiers, noblemen and the muslim public, which would allow him to rule effectively.

Like many other misguided men he came to believed that Islam meant only violent, subjugation and persecution.…

The Lopez Effect

Every now & then things get tough for a lot of organisations. This may be caused by technology, competition, recession or whatever. When the nasty stuff hits the fan, this is what typically happens at large organisations;

The CMD (Chairman & Managing Director) will call a meeting and scream and rant on how useless and lazy his entire management team is and how they have let the organisation's profitability slide. blah, blah, blah!!!!

The boss desperately searches for a scapegoat. Sometimes sacrificial lambs are found and a few heads roll and the situation only deteriorates because attacking people rather problems never helps. Sometimes the boss realises the truth, that there is no one individual or department or function that can be specifically blamed except the boss himself.

After venting his ire, the boss will issue a diktat to the management team. "I want my organisation to return to high profitability so this is what the team is going to do. I want you to reduce…

The Ghosts of 1962

Lest we forget the war of 1962.
Understanding the Chinese invasion of India and the aftermath.




In late 1940s two sleeping giants began to stir awake. 
Barring the gruesome partition, modern democratic India had a peaceful birth in 1947. Nehru the Indian prime minister therefore believed, power came from eloquence, amity and diplomacy. 

China (PRC) on the other hand had a very violent birth in 1949, hence Mao Tse-tung held the belief that power came from the barrel of a gun. 

Nehru fancied himself as becoming a world leader. He wanted India and China to partner together, to create a third pole that would not be aligned to either American led West Capitalistic block nor the Soviet led Communist block. In pursuit of this dream he stooped and pampered China to no end. He fawned over China and also rued that he did not have the type of committed cadre that Mao had.

This approach did not go down well with the Americans nor the Russians, who wanted to retain their global preeminence. They both wan…