Skip to main content

Laughter of Sages and Preachers






"One of the big differences between a genuine sage and a preacher is gaiety. When the sage laughs it is a belly laugh; when the preacher laughs, which is all too seldom, it is on the wrong side of the face."

~ Henry Miller

______________________________

Humanity has always struggled to understand Creation, and Man's place in it. Creation is so infinitely vast and complex that it is impossible to understand, but it has not stopped man from trying. 

Some wise and enlightened beings had credible answers, and this illuminated many minds and souls. Some of this wisdom was retained in the memories of others and they in turn wrote many texts, which in turn repeatedly produced more memories and texts. Mankind has already drowned in an ocean of memories, texts and analysis.

Teachers that came earlier had themselves experienced much. They considered teaching a calling, and they shared their wisdom freely and widely,  in addition to their usually working at some honest profession to earn a living. 

Teachers can only share what they have experienced.  Now we have people who have experienced little or nothing and teach for a living.  Teaching, the noblest of activities has been mostly reduced to a chore. Its called professional preaching. Such activity is devoid of life.  

So abundant are preachers, that if one were to throw a stone, randomly in any direction its quite likely that it will hit a preacher. We now live in a world full of preachers, issuing instructions to us  about every conceivable subject and with great authority. Preachers blindly reproduce religious, scientific and philosophical texts, thoughts and ideas of other people, and 'authorities' inevitably transforming life into drudgery. 

Not all teachers are preachers, there are also sages. 

A sage is someone with both intellectual and spiritual knowledge and wisdom and has usually experienced what they teach. When words and actions are born from one's own mind and being, then they have a life all of their own.  They infuse excitement and meaning to life, that is to be lived.

Question is, how does one differentiate a sage from a preacher?
One of the answers is gaiety or happiness. 

Fake or insincere people often possess enormous data some true, most borrowed and a lot of it cooked up.  They are usually out of tune with humanity, creation and life in general. They can easily be spotted by their dull, boring and tiring manner, which is devoid of any excitement or joy. To make up for quality they demonstrate seriousness as a means to show importance.

Truly spiritual people are seriously deep, but from them wells out a joy, a bliss so endearing that it positively transforms the thoughts and character of people around them.

Take a look around, are you amongst preachers or sages?
_________________________


Henry Miller
American writer Henry Valentine Miller (1891 – 1980) developed a new sort of semi-autobiographical novel that blended character study, social criticism, philosophical reflection, explicit language, sex, surrealist free association and mysticism. 

Most of his writing, literary criticism, and paintings are based on his experiences in New York and Paris. Talented, and outspoken, hence controversial and feared, his writing was banned in many countries including the United States until 1961.

Quote: by Henry Miller
Article Written by: Gurvinder Singh 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Last thoughts and words of Emperor Aurangzeb

The 6th Mughal emperor of India, Aurangzeb was a brave but cruel man. While he was an excellent military leader, he was a weak administrator with poor understanding of economics. As a result he landed up being dependent on corrupt, fanatical people who only hungered for power and wealth.

Aurangzeb's lust for power was insatiable. In this quest he spared no one, imprisoning his own father, and slaughtering his brothers and nephews. He inherited an expanding empire which permitted him to rule the largest area of the Mughal empire's history, before he led it into decline. 

He felt that his actions had probably made him repugnant to the people and his legitimacy to rule would always be questioned. So he adopted a frugal life style and tried to be a good Muslim to appease the powerful clerics, soldiers, noblemen and the muslim public, which would allow him to rule effectively.

Like many other misguided men he came to believed that Islam meant only violent, subjugation and persecution.…

The Lopez Effect

Every now & then things get tough for a lot of organisations. This may be caused by technology, competition, recession or whatever. When the nasty stuff hits the fan, this is what typically happens at large organisations;

The CMD (Chairman & Managing Director) will call a meeting and scream and rant on how useless and lazy his entire management team is and how they have let the organisation's profitability slide. blah, blah, blah!!!!

The boss desperately searches for a scapegoat. Sometimes sacrificial lambs are found and a few heads roll and the situation only deteriorates because attacking people rather problems never helps. Sometimes the boss realises the truth, that there is no one individual or department or function that can be specifically blamed except the boss himself.

After venting his ire, the boss will issue a diktat to the management team. "I want my organisation to return to high profitability so this is what the team is going to do. I want you to reduce…

Ideology is not Philosophy

We often use words carelessly when communicating and that can lead to much confusion and even misunderstandings.  Take the case of the terms ideology and philosophy which are often used interchangeably. 

The ideologist believes that he or she is right and all those who disagree are wrong.
The philosopher believes that there may be differing perspectives and he or she might have missed something, or the other person has an alternate perspective, and they are  perfectly within their rights to have a differing view.

The ideologist is extremely confident, the philosopher always harbours doubts.
The ideologist is intolerant and if he has no choice will at best tolerate you. The philosopher respects you. 

The hallmark of a true civilisation is that there is scope for dissent, and yet be respected. 
As my friend Bala Adiga says, "One can always disagree without being disagreeable"
This is clearly the philosophy of the East evident in India and many parts of Asia.

The ideologist is masculin…