Skip to main content

Laughter of Sages and Preachers

"One of the big differences between a genuine sage and a preacher is gaiety. When the sage laughs it is a belly laugh; when the preacher laughs, which is all too seldom, it is on the wrong side of the face."

~ Henry Miller


Humanity has always struggled to understand Creation, and Man's place in it. Creation is so infinitely vast and complex that it is impossible to understand, but it has not stopped man from trying. 

Some wise and enlightened beings had credible answers, and this illuminated many minds and souls. Some of this wisdom was retained in the memories of others and they in turn wrote many texts, which in turn repeatedly produced more memories and texts. Mankind has already drowned in an ocean of memories, texts and analysis.

Teachers that came earlier had themselves experienced much. They considered teaching a calling, and they shared their wisdom freely and widely,  in addition to their usually working at some honest profession to earn a living. 

Teachers can only share what they have experienced.  Now we have people who have experienced little or nothing and teach for a living.  Teaching, the noblest of activities has been mostly reduced to a chore. Its called professional preaching. Such activity is devoid of life.  

So abundant are preachers, that if one were to throw a stone, randomly in any direction its quite likely that it will hit a preacher. We now live in a world full of preachers, issuing instructions to us  about every conceivable subject and with great authority. Preachers blindly reproduce religious, scientific and philosophical texts, thoughts and ideas of other people, and 'authorities' inevitably transforming life into drudgery. 

Not all teachers are preachers, there are also sages. 

A sage is someone with both intellectual and spiritual knowledge and wisdom and has usually experienced what they teach. When words and actions are born from one's own mind and being, then they have a life all of their own.  They infuse excitement and meaning to life, that is to be lived.

Question is, how does one differentiate a sage from a preacher?
One of the answers is gaiety or happiness. 

Fake or insincere people often possess enormous data some true, most borrowed and a lot of it cooked up.  They are usually out of tune with humanity, creation and life in general. They can easily be spotted by their dull, boring and tiring manner, which is devoid of any excitement or joy. To make up for quality they demonstrate seriousness as a means to show importance.

Truly spiritual people are seriously deep, but from them wells out a joy, a bliss so endearing that it positively transforms the thoughts and character of people around them.

Take a look around, are you amongst preachers or sages?

Henry Miller
American writer Henry Valentine Miller (1891 – 1980) developed a new sort of semi-autobiographical novel that blended character study, social criticism, philosophical reflection, explicit language, sex, surrealist free association and mysticism. 

Most of his writing, literary criticism, and paintings are based on his experiences in New York and Paris. Talented, and outspoken, hence controversial and feared, his writing was banned in many countries including the United States until 1961.

Quote: by Henry Miller
Article Written by: Gurvinder Singh 


Popular posts from this blog

Last thoughts and words of Emperor Aurangzeb

The 6th Mughal emperor of India, Aurangzeb was a brave but cruel man. While he was an excellent military leader, he was a weak administrator with poor understanding of economics. As a result he landed up being dependent on corrupt, fanatical people who only hungered for power and wealth.

Aurangzeb's lust for power was insatiable. In this quest he spared no one, imprisoning his own father, and slaughtering his brothers and nephews. He inherited an expanding empire which permitted him to rule the largest area of the Mughal empire's history, before he led it into decline. 

He felt that his actions had probably made him repugnant to the people and his legitimacy to rule would always be questioned. So he adopted a frugal life style and tried to be a good Muslim to appease the powerful clerics, soldiers, noblemen and the muslim public, which would allow him to rule effectively.

Like many other misguided men he came to believed that Islam meant only violent, subjugation and persecution.…

The Lopez Effect

Every now & then things get tough for a lot of organisations. This may be caused by technology, competition, recession or whatever. When the nasty stuff hits the fan, this is what typically happens at large organisations;

The CMD (Chairman & Managing Director) will call a meeting and scream and rant on how useless and lazy his entire management team is and how they have let the organisation's profitability slide. blah, blah, blah!!!!

The boss desperately searches for a scapegoat. Sometimes sacrificial lambs are found and a few heads roll and the situation only deteriorates because attacking people rather problems never helps. Sometimes the boss realises the truth, that there is no one individual or department or function that can be specifically blamed except the boss himself.

After venting his ire, the boss will issue a diktat to the management team. "I want my organisation to return to high profitability so this is what the team is going to do. I want you to reduce…

The Ghosts of 1962

Lest we forget the war of 1962.
Understanding the Chinese invasion of India and the aftermath.

In late 1940s two sleeping giants began to stir awake. 
Barring the gruesome partition, modern democratic India had a peaceful birth in 1947. Nehru the Indian prime minister therefore believed, power came from eloquence, amity and diplomacy. 

China (PRC) on the other hand had a very violent birth in 1949, hence Mao Tse-tung held the belief that power came from the barrel of a gun. 

Nehru fancied himself as becoming a world leader. He wanted India and China to partner together, to create a third pole that would not be aligned to either American led West Capitalistic block nor the Soviet led Communist block. In pursuit of this dream he stooped and pampered China to no end. He fawned over China and also rued that he did not have the type of committed cadre that Mao had.

This approach did not go down well with the Americans nor the Russians, who wanted to retain their global preeminence. They both wan…