Skip to main content

Waiter



                                   

If you go to a restaurant, there is almost always a waiter to serve you. The reason the person is called a waiter is he or she waits on you.

The waiter's job is to wait. To not only wait but also watch and respond to the guest seeking information or some service. 

No one likes to be summoned by the snapping of fingers, talked down in a demeaning manner or to clean up an unnecessary mess. The waiter's job is challenging especially when demands of guests are unreasonable.

While waiting is common in restaurants, what do we say when this happens in organisations? It is quite common for even highly qualified and senior people having to wait on their bosses and political masters.

Many bosses and even heads of families like to hold a grand audience with several people waiting on them. This makes them feel important while making people around them feel small and no more than minions.




Shockingly many an organisation and even families that I advise  or work with, unfortunately have a number of highly qualified, well paid people functioning as mere waiters. What a tragic waste of talent and resources?

One of the things I watch out for when I begin an assignment is to observe the waiter factor. 
If the owners and leaders or the managers and bosses have a number of people constantly waiting on them, then I usually find that morale and performance is poor. As a result that organisation or family has or soon likely to face serious problems.


If people wait on bosses then they are treated as riff-raff. The boss will inevitably  complain that the people have no initiative, are lazy or lacking in the 'right' attitude. They will also complain that they alone have to do everything and no one else shows any concern.

If people do not wait then they are condemned as not having the 'right values', or are impertinent or are not team players.

People who normally wait unreasonably on their bosses are either fearful, incompetent lacking in self respect, or a sense of purpose. 

Forcing people to wait on you simply because they have no choice is disrespectful and unproductive.  Be sure, those who can flee from you will do so at the first opportunity. However those without options who are compelled to stay on tend to become bitter and increasingly seethe with anger. It is most likely that given the opportunity most waiters will one day strike back and harm the offending leaders and the organisation.

Its useful to remember, what goes around, comes around.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Last thoughts and words of Emperor Aurangzeb

The 6th Mughal emperor of India, Aurangzeb was a brave but cruel man. While he was an excellent military leader, he was a weak administrator with poor understanding of economics. As a result he landed up being dependent on corrupt, fanatical people who only hungered for power and wealth.

Aurangzeb's lust for power was insatiable. In this quest he spared no one, imprisoning his own father, and slaughtering his brothers and nephews. He inherited an expanding empire which permitted him to rule the largest area of the Mughal empire's history, before he led it into decline. 

He felt that his actions had probably made him repugnant to the people and his legitimacy to rule would always be questioned. So he adopted a frugal life style and tried to be a good Muslim to appease the powerful clerics, soldiers, noblemen and the muslim public, which would allow him to rule effectively.

Like many other misguided men he came to believed that Islam meant only violent, subjugation and persecution.…

The Lopez Effect

Every now & then things get tough for a lot of organisations. This may be caused by technology, competition, recession or whatever. When the nasty stuff hits the fan, this is what typically happens at large organisations;

The CMD (Chairman & Managing Director) will call a meeting and scream and rant on how useless and lazy his entire management team is and how they have let the organisation's profitability slide. blah, blah, blah!!!!

The boss desperately searches for a scapegoat. Sometimes sacrificial lambs are found and a few heads roll and the situation only deteriorates because attacking people rather problems never helps. Sometimes the boss realises the truth, that there is no one individual or department or function that can be specifically blamed except the boss himself.

After venting his ire, the boss will issue a diktat to the management team. "I want my organisation to return to high profitability so this is what the team is going to do. I want you to reduce…

The Ghosts of 1962

Lest we forget the war of 1962.
Understanding the Chinese invasion of India and the aftermath.




In late 1940s two sleeping giants began to stir awake. 
Barring the gruesome partition, modern democratic India had a peaceful birth in 1947. Nehru the Indian prime minister therefore believed, power came from eloquence, amity and diplomacy. 

China (PRC) on the other hand had a very violent birth in 1949, hence Mao Tse-tung held the belief that power came from the barrel of a gun. 

Nehru fancied himself as becoming a world leader. He wanted India and China to partner together, to create a third pole that would not be aligned to either American led West Capitalistic block nor the Soviet led Communist block. In pursuit of this dream he stooped and pampered China to no end. He fawned over China and also rued that he did not have the type of committed cadre that Mao had.

This approach did not go down well with the Americans nor the Russians, who wanted to retain their global preeminence. They both wan…